Select the year you wish to search:
/
1995 /
2001 /
2003
Affirmative
Action / 199595.38 Affirmative action [U.S.
Supreme Court decision in Adarand; strict scrutiny
required, but notfatal], 372.
95.45 Business may save affirmative
action [more businesses setting hiring goals, given growinghousehold income of African-Americans--which in 130 cities and counties surpasses that ofwhites], 384.
95.47 Affirmative action and consumer
fraud [lawsuit alleges white and Asian applicants not informedabout racial preferences for African-Americans], 384.
95.51 California Regents eliminate race-based
affirmative action [excerpts from Regents' resolution;outline of former affirmative action program; Asian-American Regent and Berkeley graduatingclass president support resolution], 389.
95.61 A focus on "place, not race" in
affirmative action programs [traditional affirmative actionprograms increasingly unpopular with the public; Stanford Professor Claude Steele proposes aracially integrated transition program for new students in order to counter stereotypevulnerability], 411.
Return to Top Return to Topical Index
Affirmative Action (see also race relations) / 200101.36 Assessing
applicants as individuals. [In Johnson v. Board of
Regents, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
11th Circuit struck down the University of
Georgia Undergraduate affirmative action program], 2034.
Return to Top Return to Topical Index
Affirmative Action (see also race relations) / 2003
03.1 Justice Douglas on affirmative action, p. 3097.
03.26 The future of affirmative action [Excerpts fromGruttinger v. Bollinger, concluding that "student bodydiversity is a compelling state interest" that can justify the use of carefully monitored and narrowly tailoredracial classifications in university admissions. The roadahead, however, is full of potential detours, including an apparent "sunset" provision stated by Justice O'Connor], 3155.
03.27 The future of affirmative action, part II [Excerpts from Gruttinger v. Bollinger], 3158. 03.28 Affirmative Action: The next 25 years [Analysis of"narrow tailoring" requirements; new controversies and more litigation; the converging influence of demographics and economics; under-representation oflow income families; Orlando Patterson on the need for "modified" affirmative action], 3162.
Return to Top Return to Topical Index
